شناسایی اولویت‌های پایداری در فازهای چرخه عمر پروژه‌های پالایشگاه نفت

نوع مقاله : ترویجی

نویسندگان

1 دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشکده فنی، دانشگاه تهران

2 مدیر گروه تحقیقاتی بهینه‌سازی مهندسی، دانشکده فنی، دانشگاه تهران

3 محقق ارشد، دفتر توسعه پایدار، دانشگاه امیرکبیر

4 رئیس حفاظت محیط‌زیست شرکت ملی پالایش و پخش فرآورده‌های نفتی ایران

چکیده

با توجه به جایگاه پروژه‌های زیربنایی و انرژی به‌خصوص پروژه‌های پالایشگاه نفت در توسعه کشورها و همچنین تأثیرات مخرب زیست‌محیطی، اجتماعی و حتی اقتصادی آن‌ها در کوتاه‌مدت و بلندمدت، این تحقیق به دنبال شناسایی چارچوب ارزیابی بر مبنای ادبیات توسعه پایدار و سپس تطبیق آن با فازهای مختلف در چرخه عمر و بخش‌های مختلف پالایشگاه نفت است تا علاوه بر اطمینان از جامعیت چارچوب ارائه شده، تحلیل دقیقی از اولویت‌های پایداری در فازهای چرخه عمر انجام شود. دستاوردهای این تحقیق برای مدیران در لایه­های مختلف مدیریتی تصمیم‌سازی نموده و در هر مرحله با کاهش ابهامات مسیر بحرانی تصمیم­گیری را با دیدگاه بلندمدت نشان می­دهد. لذا ابزار قدرتمندی در حوزه­های مختلف تصمیم­گیری در اختیار مدیران و صاحب‌نظران این صنعت خواهد بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identification of Sustainability Priorities in the Life Cycle Phases of Petroleum Refinery Projects

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Hamidreza Hasheminasab 1
  • Yaghob Gholipour 2
  • Mohammadreza Kharrazi 3
  • Aliakbar Khorasani Zade 4
1 School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Engineering Optimization Research Gr., College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Office of Sustainable Development, Amir Kabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
4 Head of Environmental Protection, National Iranian Oil Refining and Distribution Company, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

With regard to the strong position of the infrastructural projects specially petroleum refinery projects, in development of countries, and negative environmental, social, an even economic effects whether in short-term or long-term, this study develops a sustainable development framework based on the literature review and evaluate its adaption to different phases in the project life-cycle and petroleum refinery parts. So that, in addition to ensure the development of comprehensive sustainability framework, sustainability priorities will be achieved in different phases of the targeted project. The study outputs will help managers at different levels in their decision makings by reducing the ambiguity of the decision environment and demonstrating the critical path by a long-term viewpoint. Hence, it will be a powerful tool in different areas of decision making for different managers and experts in this industry.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sustainable Development
  • Petroleum Refinery
  • Life-Cycle
  • Sustainability Priorities
  • Decision Framework

مراجع

[1] Dernbach, J. C. 1998. Sustainable development as a framework for national governance. Case W. Res. L. Rev., 49, 1.
[2] Dernbach, J. C. 2002. Making sustainable development happen: From Johannesburg to Albany. Alb. L. Envtl. Outlook, 8, 173.s
[3] Hall, R. P. 2006. Understanding and applying the concept of sustainable development to transportation planning and decision-making in the US. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[4] Bruntland, G. 1987. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED, 1987): Our common future: Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[5] Fay, M., Toman, M., Benitez, D., & Csordas, S. 2011. Infrastructure and sustainable development. Postcrisis Growth and Development: A Development Agenda for the G, 20, pp. 329-382.
[6] (OECD), O. f. E. C.-o. A. D. 2003. OECD Environment Indicators: Development, Measurement, and Use. Paris: OECD.
[7] Shen, L., Wu, Y., & Zhang, X. 2010. Key assessment indicators for the sustainability of infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(6), pp. 441-451.
[8] Ugwu, O., Kumaraswamy, M., Wong, A., & Ng, S. 2006. Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP): Part 1. Development of indicators and computational methods. Automation in Construction, 15(2), pp. 239-251.
[9] Mihyeon Jeon, C., & Amekudzi, A. 2005. Addressing sustainability in transportation systems: definitions, indicators, and metrics. Journal of infrastructure systems, 11(1), pp. 31-50.
[10] Chong, Y. T., Teo, K. M., & Tang, L. C. (2016). A lifecycle-based sustainability indicator framework for waste-to-energy systems and a proposed metric of sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, pp. 797-809.
[11] Spalding-Fecher, R. 2003. Indicators of sustainability for the energy sector: a South African case study. Energy for Sustainable Development, 7 (1), pp. 35-49.
[12] Stamford, L., & Azapagic, A. 2011. Sustainability indicators for the assessment of nuclear power. Energy, 36(10), pp. 6037-6057.
[13] Stamford, L., & Azapagic, A. 2012. Life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity options for the UK. International Journal of Energy Research, 36(14), pp. 1263-1290.
[14] Heravi, G., Fathi, M., & Faeghi, S. 2015. Evaluation of sustainability indicators of industrial buildings focused on petrochemical projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, pp. 92-107.
[15] Silvestre, B. S., & Gimenes, F. A. P. 2017. A sustainability paradox? Sustainable operations in the offshore oil and gas industry: The case of Petrobras. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, pp. 360-370.
[16] Ahmad, W. N. K. W., Rezaei, J., de Brito, M. P., & Tavasszy, L. A. 2016. The influence of external factors on supply chain sustainability goals of the oil and gas industry. Resources Policy, 49, pp. 302-314.
[17] George, R. A., Siti-Nabiha, A., Jalaludin, D., & Abdalla, Y. A. 2016. Barriers to and enablers of sustainability integration in the performance management systems of an oil and gas company. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, pp. 197-212.
[18] Ba-Shammakh, M. S. 2010. Generalized mathematical model for SO2 reduction in an oil refinery based on Arabian light crude oil. Energy & Fuels, 24(6), pp. 3526-3533.
[19] Verdantix. 2014. US oil and gas sustainable business spend 2012-2017. Retrieved from http://enablon.com/reports/us-oil-gas-sustainable-business-spend-2012-2017
[20] Lozanova, S. 2014. US oil and gas sustainability spending sluggish compared to extraction growth. Retrieved from https://www.triplepundit.com/2014/01/us-oil-gas-sustainability-spending-grow-sluggish-compared-extraction-growth/
[21] Pulver, S. 2007. Making sense of corporate environmentalism: an environmental contestation approach to analyzing the causes and consequences of the climate change policy split in the oil industry. Organization & Environment, 20 (1), pp. 44-83.
[22] Webb, T. 2009. Shell dumps wind, solar and hydro power in favour of biofuels. The Guardian, 17.
[23] Holmgren, K., & Sternhufvud, C. 2008. CO 2-emission reduction costs for petroleum refineries in Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(3), pp. 385-394.
[24] Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. R. 2014. Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12 (1), pp. 70-78.
[25] Labuschagne, C., Brent, A. C., & Van Erck, R. P. 2005. Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13 (4), pp. 373-385.
[26] Cass, D., & Mukherjee, A. 2011. Calculation of greenhouse gas emissions for highway construction operations by using a hybrid life-cycle assessment approach: case study for pavement operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137 (11), pp. 1015-1025.
[27] Hasheminasab, H., Gholipour, Y., Kharrazi, M., & Streimikiene, D. 2018. A novel Metric of Sustainability for petroleum refinery projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, pp. 1215-1224.
[28] Hasheminasab, H., Gholipour, Y., Kharrazi, M., Streimikiene, D., & Hashemkhani, S. 2020. A dynamic sustainability framework for petroleum refinery projects with a life cycle attitude. Sustainable Development.
[29] Hasheminasab, H., Gholipour, Y., Kharrazi, M., & Streimikiene, D. 2018. Life cycle approach in sustainability assessment for petroleum refinery projects with fuzzy-AHP. Energy & Environment, 29 (7), pp. 1208-1223.
[30] Gholipour, Y., Hasheminasab, H., Kharrazi, M., & Streimikis, J. 2018. Sustainability criteria assessment for life-cycle phases of petroleum refinery projects by madm technique.
[31] Hasheminasab, H., Kharrazi, M., Gholipour, Y., & Streimikiene, D. 2019. A Sustainability Assessment Framework for Petroleum Refinery Projects with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques.
[32] Sierra, L. A., Pellicer, E., & Yepes, V. 2015. Social sustainability in the lifecycle of Chilean public infrastructure. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(5), pp. 05015020.
[33] (UNCSD), U. N. C. o. S. D. 2005. Indicators of Sustainable Development, CSD Theme Indicator Framework. Retrieved from New York.
[34] (UNSC), U. N. S. C. 2015. Technical report by the Bureau of the United Nations Statistical Commission on the process of the development of an indicator framework for the goals and targets of the Post-2015 Development Agenda. New York: Author. Retrieved July, 23, 2015.
[35] (GRI), G. R. I. 2013. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (G4), Global Reporting Initiative.
[36] Murray, T. J., Pipino, L. L., & van Gigch, J. P. (1985). A pilot study of fuzzy set modification of Delphi. Human Systems Management, 5(1), pp. 76-80.
[37] Chang, P.-T., Huang, L.-C., & Lin, H.-J. 2000. The fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy statistics and membership function fitting and an application to the human resources. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 112(3), pp. 511-520.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار